Reno Aces
RNO · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 31 | 26 | +4 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 25.5 | 26.9 | −1.4 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2220 | 1423 | +796 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 54.6% | 34.5% | +20.1% | 4th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 12 | 74 | −62 | 14th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 31 | 36 | −5 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 69.8% | 71.6% | −1.8% | 16th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 22 | 17 | +4 | 24th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -34 | 0 | −34 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.32 | 0.00 | −0.32 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.73 | 5.41 | +0.32 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.05 | 5.41 | +0.64 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .462 | .500 | −.038 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .475 | .501 | −.026 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -1.3 | -0.1 | −1.2 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .538 | .505 | +.033 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .514 | .501 | +.013 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .333 | .495 | −.162 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .491 | .518 | −.027 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .429 | .482 | −.053 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .450 | .502 | −.052 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 24th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".