Oklahoma City Comets
OKC · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 23 | 26 | −3 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 27.3 | 26.9 | +0.4 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1371 | 1439 | −68 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 33.2% | 34.6% | −1.4% | 16th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 72 | 75 | −3 | 12th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 33 | 36 | −3 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 71.5% | 71.8% | −0.3% | 13th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 19 | 18 | — | 18th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 113 | 0 | +113 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 1.08 | 0.00 | +1.08 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.30 | 5.41 | +0.89 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.22 | 5.41 | −0.19 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .543 | .500 | +.043 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .585 | .501 | +.084 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -4.4 | -0.1 | −4.3 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .483 | .504 | −.021 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .694 | .501 | +.193 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .200 | .499 | −.299 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .574 | .518 | +.056 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .510 | .482 | +.028 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .620 | .502 | +.118 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 5 | +1 | 4th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".