Jersey Shore BlueClaws
JS · South Atlantic League South Atlantic League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 40 | 27 | +12 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 23.6 | 22.7 | +1.0 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 4062 | 4710 | −648 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 85.9% | 94.8% | −8.9% | 28th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 1st of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 38 | 36 | +1 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 67.7% | 64.7% | +3.0% | 9th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 16 | 20 | −4 | 2nd of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -121 | 0 | −121 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.96 | 0.00 | −0.96 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.25 | 5.55 | −1.30 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.21 | 5.55 | −0.34 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .365 | .500 | −.135 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .408 | .501 | −.093 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -5.4 | -0.1 | −5.3 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .432 | .499 | −.067 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .385 | .502 | −.117 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .429 | .513 | −.084 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .354 | .518 | −.164 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .377 | .484 | −.107 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .366 | .509 | −.143 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 6 | −2 | 30th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A+ clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".