Iowa Cubs
IOW · International League International League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 26 | 29 | −3 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 26.9 | 26.9 | — | 16th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2001 | 1750 | +250 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 39.6% | 35.1% | +4.5% | 12th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 223 | 85 | +137 | 7th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 55 | 41 | +13 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 67.0% | 72.9% | −5.9% | 25th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 28 | 22 | +5 | 24th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -121 | 0 | −121 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.99 | 0.00 | −0.99 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.36 | 5.40 | −0.04 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.35 | 5.40 | +0.95 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .413 | .500 | −.087 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .423 | .501 | −.078 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -1.2 | -0.1 | −1.1 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .406 | .502 | −.096 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .444 | .500 | −.056 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .600 | .508 | +.092 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .393 | .517 | −.124 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .433 | .483 | −.050 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .440 | .500 | −.060 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 6 | −1 | 18th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".