FCL Tigers
F-TIG · Florida Complex League Florida Complex League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 26 | 20 | +5 | 13th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 20.2 | 18.9 | +1.3 | 12th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1979 | 2137 | −158 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 98.2% | 99.2% | −1.0% | 67th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 33 | 26 | +6 | 15th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 54.4% | 63.4% | −9.0% | 69th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 10 | 10 | — | 36th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 23 | 0 | +23 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.40 | -0.00 | +0.40 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.31 | 6.20 | −0.89 | 67th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.91 | 6.20 | −1.29 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .483 | .500 | −.017 | 44th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .535 | .503 | +.032 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -3.0 | -0.2 | −2.8 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .214 | .496 | −.282 | 81st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .625 | .501 | +.124 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .483 | .557 | −.074 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .483 | .443 | +.040 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .483 | .501 | −.018 | 48th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 46th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".