FCL Tigers
F-TIG · Florida Complex League Florida Complex League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 26 | 19 | +6 | 13th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 20.2 | 18.9 | +1.3 | 12th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1979 | 1762 | +216 | 24th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 98.2% | 99.2% | −1.0% | 67th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 33 | 25 | +7 | 15th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 54.4% | 61.1% | −6.7% | 61st of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 10 | 8 | +1 | 55th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 22 | 0 | +22 | 32nd of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.37 | -0.00 | +0.37 | 35th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.36 | 6.25 | −0.89 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.98 | 6.26 | −1.28 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .475 | .500 | −.025 | 49th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .533 | .502 | +.031 | 34th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -3.4 | -0.1 | −3.3 | 73rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .200 | .493 | −.293 | 79th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .625 | .503 | +.122 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .483 | .560 | −.077 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .467 | .440 | +.028 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .475 | .501 | −.026 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 4 | — | 44th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".