FCL Blue Jays
F-BLU · Florida Complex League Florida Complex League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 40 | 20 | +19 | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 20.8 | 18.9 | +1.9 | 3rd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2093 | 2137 | −44 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 96.5% | 99.2% | −2.7% | 76th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 34 | 26 | +7 | 11th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 64.2% | 63.4% | +0.8% | 34th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 5 | 10 | −5 | 2nd of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 97 | 0 | +97 | 13th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 1.67 | -0.00 | +1.67 | 12th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.60 | 6.20 | +0.40 | 30th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.93 | 6.20 | −1.27 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .655 | .500 | +.155 | 7th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .631 | .503 | +.128 | 13th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 1.4 | -0.2 | +1.6 | 19th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .692 | .496 | +.196 | 7th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .714 | .501 | +.213 | 12th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .525 | −.525 | 42nd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .667 | .557 | +.110 | 19th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .643 | .443 | +.200 | 7th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .655 | .501 | +.154 | 14th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 5 | +2 | 10th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".