DSL Rangers Red
D-RNR · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 21 | 20 | — | 32nd of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.3 | 18.9 | −0.5 | 46th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2561 | 2137 | +423 | 7th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 31 | 26 | +4 | 21st of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 57.7% | 63.4% | −5.7% | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 11 | 10 | — | 46th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -19 | 0 | −19 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.34 | -0.00 | −0.34 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 8.09 | 6.20 | +1.89 | 2nd of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 8.43 | 6.20 | +2.23 | 77th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .464 | .500 | −.036 | 47th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .481 | .503 | −.022 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.9 | -0.2 | −0.7 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .286 | .496 | −.210 | 77th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .464 | .500 | −.036 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .525 | −.525 | 42nd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .607 | .557 | +.050 | 31st of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .321 | .443 | −.122 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .500 | .501 | −.001 | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 29th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".