DSL Orioles Orange
D-ORO · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Central · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 15 | 19 | −4 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.2 | 18.9 | −0.7 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1517 | 1730 | −213 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 18 | 25 | −7 | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 50.3% | 61.0% | −10.7% | 70th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 7 | 8 | −1 | 25th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -23 | 0 | −23 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.55 | -0.00 | −0.55 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.69 | 6.26 | −0.57 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.24 | 6.27 | −0.03 | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .429 | .500 | −.071 | 58th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .458 | .502 | −.044 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -1.2 | -0.1 | −1.1 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .500 | .493 | +.007 | 37th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .357 | .503 | −.146 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .527 | +.473 | 1st of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .571 | .560 | +.011 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .286 | .440 | −.154 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .519 | .500 | +.019 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 4 | — | 43rd of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".