DSL NYY Bombers
D-NYB · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southeast · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 17 | 20 | −3 | 48th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.6 | 18.9 | −0.3 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2153 | 2090 | +62 | 32nd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 23 | 26 | −3 | 47th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 68.4% | 63.0% | +5.3% | 19th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 6 | 9 | −3 | 6th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 3 | 0 | +3 | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.06 | -0.00 | +0.06 | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 7.85 | 6.20 | +1.65 | 4th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.79 | 6.20 | +1.59 | 75th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .442 | .500 | −.058 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .503 | .503 | — | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -3.2 | -0.2 | −3.0 | 70th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .286 | .494 | −.208 | 74th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .467 | .502 | −.035 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .525 | −.525 | 42nd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .500 | .557 | −.057 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .385 | .443 | −.058 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .345 | .501 | −.156 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 29th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".