DSL Mets Blue
D-MEB · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southeast · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 20 | 20 | — | 36th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 17.8 | 18.9 | −1.1 | 75th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2282 | 2137 | +144 | 21st of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 27 | 26 | — | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 59.2% | 63.4% | −4.2% | 54th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 9 | 10 | −1 | 31st of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -122 | 0 | −122 | 75th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -2.18 | -0.00 | −2.18 | 74th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.36 | 6.20 | +0.16 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 8.54 | 6.20 | +2.34 | 78th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .357 | .500 | −.143 | 70th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .368 | .503 | −.135 | 72nd of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.6 | -0.2 | −0.4 | 46th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .579 | .496 | +.083 | 19th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .227 | .500 | −.273 | 72nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .525 | −.525 | 42nd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .464 | .557 | −.093 | 65th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .250 | .443 | −.193 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .281 | .501 | −.220 | 75th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 3 | 5 | −2 | 65th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".