DSL Marlins
D-MRL · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southeast · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 21 | 20 | — | 32nd of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 17.9 | 18.9 | −0.9 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2364 | 2137 | +226 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 22 | 26 | −4 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 79.4% | 63.4% | +16.1% | 4th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 11 | 10 | — | 46th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 71 | 0 | +71 | 18th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 1.29 | -0.00 | +1.29 | 17th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 7.16 | 6.20 | +0.96 | 15th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.87 | 6.20 | −0.33 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .582 | .500 | +.082 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .590 | .503 | +.087 | 18th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.4 | -0.2 | −0.2 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .471 | .496 | −.024 | 46th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .652 | .500 | +.152 | 21st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .525 | +.475 | 1st of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .556 | .557 | −.001 | 41st of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .607 | .443 | +.164 | 11th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .625 | .501 | +.124 | 17th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 5 | +1 | 15th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".