DSL Marlins
D-MRL · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southeast · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 16 | 19 | −3 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.0 | 18.9 | −0.8 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1368 | 1686 | −318 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 17 | 24 | −7 | 77th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 70.7% | 60.7% | +10.0% | 13th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 6 | 8 | −2 | 17th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 53 | 0 | +53 | 18th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 1.33 | -0.00 | +1.33 | 17th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.95 | 6.28 | +0.67 | 21st of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.63 | 6.28 | −0.65 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .550 | .500 | +.050 | 34th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .596 | .502 | +.094 | 17th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -1.8 | -0.1 | −1.7 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .333 | .496 | −.163 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .619 | .503 | +.116 | 27th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .519 | +.481 | 1st of 57 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .571 | .561 | +.010 | 42nd of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .526 | .438 | +.088 | 22nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .591 | .500 | +.091 | 25th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 4 | +2 | 12th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".