DSL Giants Orange
D-GIO · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 16 | 20 | −4 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 19.0 | 18.9 | +0.1 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1760 | 2065 | −305 | 72nd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 21 | 26 | −5 | 59th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 48.6% | 62.9% | −14.4% | 78th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 10 | 9 | — | 39th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 13 | 0 | +13 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.25 | 0.00 | +0.25 | 37th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.38 | 6.21 | −0.83 | 65th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.13 | 6.21 | −1.08 | 15th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .558 | .500 | +.058 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .522 | .503 | +.019 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 1.9 | -0.2 | +2.1 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .571 | .494 | +.077 | 24th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .524 | .503 | +.021 | 37th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .523 | +.477 | 1st of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .692 | .558 | +.134 | 13th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .423 | .442 | −.019 | 49th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .667 | .501 | +.166 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 29th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".