DSL Colorado
D-COL · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southeast · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 20 | 20 | — | 36th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.0 | 18.9 | −0.8 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2937 | 2137 | +799 | 3rd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 23 | 26 | −3 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 71.5% | 63.4% | +8.1% | 15th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 13 | 10 | +2 | 62nd of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 132 | 0 | +132 | 4th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 2.40 | -0.00 | +2.40 | 4th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 7.64 | 6.20 | +1.44 | 7th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.24 | 6.20 | −0.96 | 20th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .667 | .500 | +.167 | 6th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .666 | .503 | +.163 | 5th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.0 | -0.2 | +0.2 | 34th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .333 | .496 | −.163 | 72nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .882 | .501 | +.381 | 2nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .667 | .525 | +.142 | 26th of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .750 | .557 | +.193 | 5th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .577 | .443 | +.134 | 18th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .613 | .501 | +.112 | 19th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 9 | 5 | +3 | 7th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".