DSL CLE Goryl
D-CLG · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Central · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 14 | 19 | −5 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.2 | 18.9 | −0.7 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1565 | 1694 | −129 | 44th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 17 | 24 | −7 | 77th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 51.5% | 60.7% | −9.1% | 65th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 4 | 8 | −4 | 5th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -18 | 0 | −18 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.45 | -0.00 | −0.45 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.83 | 6.27 | +0.56 | 23rd of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.28 | 6.28 | +1.00 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .550 | .500 | +.050 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .471 | .502 | −.031 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 3.2 | -0.1 | +3.3 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .583 | .496 | +.087 | 23rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .417 | .503 | −.086 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .519 | +.481 | 1st of 57 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .619 | .561 | +.058 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .474 | .438 | +.036 | 37th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .560 | .500 | +.060 | 32nd of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 4 | — | 43rd of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".