DSL Astros Orange
D-ASO · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 14 | 19 | −5 | 69th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.2 | 18.9 | −0.7 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1544 | 1789 | −245 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 20 | 25 | −5 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 85.3% | 61.4% | +24.0% | 2nd of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 9 | 8 | — | 45th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 81 | 0 | +81 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 1.88 | -0.00 | +1.88 | 8th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.86 | 6.25 | +0.61 | 23rd of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.98 | 6.25 | −1.27 | 12th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .628 | .500 | +.128 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .643 | .502 | +.141 | 8th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.6 | -0.1 | −0.5 | 48th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .643 | .493 | +.150 | 14th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .769 | .503 | +.266 | 8th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .527 | +.473 | 1st of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .545 | .559 | −.014 | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .714 | .440 | +.274 | 4th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .708 | .501 | +.207 | 5th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 26th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".