Columbus Clippers
COL · International League International League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 27 | 31 | −4 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 24.9 | 26.9 | −2.0 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 3487 | 2062 | +1424 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 65.4% | 34.9% | +30.5% | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 102 | −102 | 17th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 39 | 44 | −5 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 64.7% | 73.4% | −8.7% | 28th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 18 | 26 | −8 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 22 | 0 | +22 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.16 | 0.00 | +0.16 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.72 | 5.33 | +0.39 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.57 | 5.33 | +0.24 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .532 | .500 | +.032 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .513 | .501 | +.012 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 2.7 | -0.1 | +2.8 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .485 | .502 | −.017 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .450 | .502 | −.052 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .429 | .507 | −.078 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .606 | .517 | +.089 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .467 | .483 | −.016 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .559 | .501 | +.058 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 6 | — | 6th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".