Columbus Clippers
COL · International League International League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 23 | 26 | −3 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 24.8 | 26.9 | −2.1 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2665 | 1390 | +1274 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 70.2% | 34.6% | +35.6% | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 64 | −64 | 15th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 33 | 36 | −3 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 64.2% | 71.5% | −7.2% | 29th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 12 | 17 | −5 | 1st of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -27 | 0 | −27 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.26 | 0.00 | −0.26 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.35 | 5.42 | −0.07 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.61 | 5.42 | +0.19 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .524 | .500 | +.024 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .478 | .501 | −.023 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 4.8 | -0.1 | +4.9 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .519 | .506 | +.014 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .357 | .500 | −.143 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .429 | .496 | −.066 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .565 | .518 | +.047 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .491 | .482 | +.009 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .557 | .502 | +.055 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 5 | +1 | 4th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".