Buffalo Bisons
BUF · International League International League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 29 | 29 | — | 16th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 26.4 | 26.9 | −0.5 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2068 | 1750 | +317 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 40.1% | 35.1% | +5.0% | 11th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 85 | −85 | 16th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 41 | 41 | — | 12th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 76.8% | 72.9% | +3.9% | 9th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 17 | 22 | −5 | 7th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -7 | 0 | −7 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.06 | 0.00 | −0.06 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.92 | 5.40 | −0.48 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.98 | 5.40 | −0.42 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .488 | .500 | −.012 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .495 | .501 | −.006 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.9 | -0.1 | −0.8 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .464 | .502 | −.038 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .500 | .500 | −.001 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .538 | .508 | +.030 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .508 | .517 | −.009 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .468 | .483 | −.015 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .485 | .500 | −.015 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 6 | −1 | 18th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".