Binghamton Rumble Ponies
BNG · Eastern League Eastern League Northeast · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 29 | 23 | +5 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 24.8 | 24.4 | +0.4 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2135 | 2756 | −621 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 58.4% | 73.7% | −15.3% | 28th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 12 | 1 | +10 | 2nd of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 34 | 29 | +4 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 58.9% | 65.2% | −6.4% | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 17 | 16 | — | 16th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -107 | 0 | −107 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.09 | 0.00 | −1.09 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.10 | 5.20 | −1.10 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.19 | 5.20 | −0.01 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .367 | .500 | −.133 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .394 | .499 | −.105 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.6 | 0.1 | −2.7 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .407 | .498 | −.091 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .355 | .499 | −.144 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .600 | .506 | +.094 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .412 | .519 | −.107 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .319 | .481 | −.162 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .431 | .500 | −.069 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 14th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".