ACL Royals
A-ROY · Arizona Complex League Arizona Complex League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 22 | 20 | +1 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 20.2 | 18.9 | +1.3 | 11th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2087 | 2137 | −50 | 41st of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 97.0% | 99.2% | −2.2% | 72nd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 27 | 26 | — | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 56.2% | 63.4% | −7.1% | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 8 | 10 | −2 | 20th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -21 | 0 | −21 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.36 | -0.00 | −0.36 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.80 | 6.20 | −0.40 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.15 | 6.20 | −0.05 | 42nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .559 | .500 | +.059 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .473 | .503 | −.030 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 5.1 | -0.2 | +5.3 | 4th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .733 | .496 | +.238 | 5th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .421 | .500 | −.080 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .525 | +.475 | 1st of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .690 | .557 | +.133 | 11th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .433 | .443 | −.010 | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .567 | .501 | +.066 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 47th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".