ACL Reds
A-RED · Arizona Complex League Arizona Complex League Central · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 26 | 20 | +5 | 13th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 20.0 | 18.9 | +1.1 | 15th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2279 | 2137 | +141 | 23rd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 99.7% | 99.2% | +0.5% | 58th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 35 | 26 | +8 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 73.2% | 63.4% | +9.8% | 11th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 12 | 10 | +1 | 53rd of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 98 | 0 | +98 | 12th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 1.66 | -0.00 | +1.66 | 13th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 7.76 | 6.20 | +1.56 | 5th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.10 | 6.20 | −0.10 | 41st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .593 | .500 | +.093 | 23rd of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .608 | .503 | +.105 | 14th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.9 | -0.2 | −0.7 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .385 | .495 | −.110 | 64th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .696 | .500 | +.196 | 15th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .250 | .525 | −.275 | 39th of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .633 | .558 | +.075 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .552 | .442 | +.110 | 23rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .545 | .501 | +.044 | 37th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 46th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".