Monday, April 8, 2013 · Security Service Field · Final
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUC | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | - | - | - | - | 14 | 16 | 0 |
| COL | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 3 | 6 | 1 |
Season matchup
TUC leads 6 of 8 categories
| TUC | Metric | COL |
|---|---|---|
| Offense | ||
| 4.66 27th | Runs scored per game | 5.06 17th |
| Pitching | ||
| 4.89 28th | Runs allowed per game | 5.81 41st |
| Roster | ||
| 27.4 31st | Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 26.9 35th |
| Results | ||
| .490 28th | Winning percentage | .463 32nd |
| -22 34th | Run differential | -71 42nd |
| .479 35th | Pythagorean winning percentage | .437 39th |
| .640 2nd | Winning percentage in one-run games | .476 31st |
| .512 25th | Home winning percentage | .525 20th |
| .473 28th | Road winning percentage | .418 36th |
2013 regular-season totals, each with the club's league rank. The greener side holds the edge; descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) have no better direction and are left uncalled.